UNITED KINGDOM
09 February 2006
Three hundred Islamic religious scholars in the UK are calling
for changes in the law to stop publication of any images of
Muhammad the prophet of Islam. They want mendments to the
Race Relations Act to give Muslims the same protection as
Sikhs and Jews. They also want the Press Complaints Commission
(PCC) to tighten their self-regulatory code of
practice to prevent the publication of pictures of Muhammad.
The scholars gathered yesterday for an emergency meeting
under the auspices of the Muslim Action Committee (MAC) at
an Islamic Centre in Small Heath, Birmingham. Chairman, Shaikh
Faiz Saddiqi, commented that it was the largest meeting of
its kind which he remembered in 25 years living in the UK.
These calls come in the wake of international Muslim outrage
about the publication of caricatures of Muhammad in Danish
and other European newspapers.
TWO MORE RALLIES PLANNED TO PROTEST DANISH CARTOONS
According to the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC),
the MAC are organising a protest rally in London on Saturday
18th February, and expect 20,000 to 50,000 people to attend.
A week earlier, on Saturday 11th February, another protest
rally, also esponding to the Danish cartoons, is being called
by Britain's two largest Muslim groupings, the mainstream
Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and the more radical Muslim
Association of Britain (MAB). According to the MAB, "non-Muslim
groups and figure-heads" will be joining the rally to
be held this Saturday under the title "United Against
Incitement and Islamophobia".
TWO ALARMING ASPECTS
Dr Patrick Sookhdeo, International Director of Barnabas Fund,
comments: "There are two very alarming aspects of the
MAC's demands. Firstly, we all have to accept the possibility
of being offended, as part of the package of free speech.
Why should there be different rules for Muslims compared with
followers of other faiths? If we pass laws or even simply
create a new PCC code of practice specifically to protect
Muhammad, I fear it could prove to be the thin end of the
wedge. From self-imposed censorship we could soon move to
more serious situations. In Pakistan there has been a mandatory
death sentence since 1991 for "defiling the name"
of Muhammad. The irony is that in earlier centuries there
were
many Muslim pictures of Muhammad, some of which can be seen
in museums both in the West and in the Muslim world.
"Secondly, I believe that the cartoons furore is being
used as a pretext for another legal battle. It was only nine
days ago that the House of Commons unexpectedly voted to pass
the Racial and Religious Hatred Bill in a form which does
not provide the protection for Muslims which the government
had intended. If the MAC are now calling for changes in the
Race Relations Act, this seems to me an attempt to get themselves
the privileged legal position the government had promised
them by another method. It is nothing to do with the cartoons.
"I am totally opposed to attacks on Muslims or anyone
else. We must protect people, but not ideas. I am therefore
strongly opposed to any changes to exsiting legislation which
already protects the whole population. I urge all readers
to work to stop these changes from being implemented and to
ensure that the level playing field is not tilted."
LETTER-WRITING CAMPAIGN AND MORE INFORMATION
Guidelines on how to write a letter on these issues will
be on the Barnabas Fund website in a few hours time. www.barnabasfund.org
Barnabas Fund will be providing further information as it
becomes available.
PRAYER ITEMS
* Pray urgently for British law-makers and decision-makers
that they will have wisdom and discernment to recognise the
full implications of the issues here. Pray that liberal British
Muslims will lead their community towards an appreciation
of genuine free speech and away from seeking special privileges
and protections which no other community has.
|